Tuesday, December 10, 2013


From a LIFE mag.series about Patton in tunisia.The general is wearing a 1st pattern tanker customized by the addition of epaulets 

another shot .....

this picture from the 1st armored Div in Tunisia shows the crew of an M3 tank wearing both types of tanker 

rare picture of a modified 1st pattern tanker.its owner clearly added pocket flaps secured by buttons 

In his up coming movie called "FURY"Brad Pitt is wearing an original 1st pattern .i bet we're going to see legions of bad copies offered on the net soon .....

Today's post is about a rare example of ww2 militaria way harder to get than any A-2 any day:the 1st pattern Combat Winter jacket,aka the "Tanker Jacket". Part of the winter combat uniform's line,the Tanker Jacket was basically a take on the classic windbreaker design with its waist cut and medium weight with two outside pockets and zipped front. There were two patterns made, the first featured on today's post,was issued in 1941.

The Winter Combat Uniform was developed in 1941 for issue to crews of armored vehicles. The uniform consisted of a cloth helmet, a jacket and overalls. All three garments were made from olive drab #3 cotton twill and lined with brown kersey wool.the jacket was replaced in 1942 by the classic "slash' pockets style.on the net ,there is a well known series of the 1st Armored Div in Tunisia taken in December of that same year. The complete series shows the crews of nearly 30 tanks, and troops wearing tanker jackets, about half are clearly 1st Models. It's normally difficult to see the pockets in other photos, especially when the wearer has field gear on or is standing in a vehicle. As for issue, these were undoubtedly issued until supplies were exhausted so they would have been worn until the end of the War. 
Although initially designed for armored vehicle crews, troops in all branches of the service strived to acquire them. Europe was cold and wet, and these jackets were far superior to the light weight M41 Jacket.The zipper was more convenient than the button/zipper of the M-41 and the shorter length was an improvement over the longer M-41 for anyone sitting or crouching The tanker became popular and many were obtained by "alternative means" by infantrymen, artillerymen and yes, even 8th and 9th AAF pilots .Tanker Jackets found their way into both the Mediterranean and Pacific theaters. It was especially favored by officers who took much of the available supply......
Variation ,as always ,can be noticed while collecting ww2 militaria but in generalfor these jackets the material was heavy khaki or OD color, If khaki, the lining was "mustard" brown while the OD jackets had a lining of the same color. 8.2 oz cotton for the outer shell with a bi-swing back. There was a knit wool collar, waistband and cuffs, as well as a wool blanket lining. The zipper front closure had a wind flap
Jacket, Combat, Winter Stock Numbers and Labeling if you're lucky to have one still on...should read:
Stock numbers were 55-J-100, 55-J-130 in a range to cover the sizes. The two pattern specifications being:
PQD Spec. No. 26 Pattern 2/10/41 as for the jacket featured today
PQD Spec. No. 26A Pattern 1/9/42 for the slash pockets model


  1. I think WW2 impressions dressed the main characters in " Fury " , at least they claim to on their website ?

  2. as usual ,as seen once a film of that caliber is out ,every replica manufacturer claims he was the sole contractor for it .in reality,most of the time,the studios place multiple orders to multiple contractors .as for BP's tanker after seeing multiple pictures of it ,it seems that his tanker is an original .on different angles you can clearly see some repairs and fixing done to it ....

  3. Just to 'give credit where credit is due': the jacket in the photo of Brad PItt on the set of Fury is a reproduction made by Juan Gonzalez and his folks at WWII Impressions. They created a few dozen jackets for PItt, and then the jackets were enhanced with elbow patches etc, and then broken-down (aged and distressed) by the skilled wardrobe technicians working on the film.
    Understandably, its far too risky for a costume supervisor to dress an actor in a one-of-a-kind, original piece when there is the inevitable need for identical jackets for numerous re-takes (allowing for blood splatter, soiling, damage in the course of the action, etc), and for wear by stuntmen, and doubles. It is a good looking jacket, and I agree with you that it'll only get more popular once the film is released.


Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.